|
January 2003 |
|
|
George Jackson |
for more
information about George click: |
|
|
The leaders |
|
Ask your self a
question ... if George Jackson was liked and respected as Deputy
Commissioner of Police on the islands of Bermuda, would
www.bermudapolice.com
have been notified of his whereabouts and activities? |
|
|
|
questions we would like answered ... |
|
www.bermudapolice.com
received information that George Jackson was in the UK interviewing
potential new recruits. It would appear that whilst George, the former head
of the island's narcotics department and now the second highest ranking
officer on the island, is in the UK his son,
Andrew Jackson recently linked to the
possession of narcotics remains in Bermuda. |
George, when did you first know of your son's association with narcotics? |
|
20th Jan 2003: Andrew Jackson, the son of Deputy Police Commissioner George
Jackson – is being punished for cannabis possession, The Royal Gazette has
learned.
|
|
|
www.bermuadpolice.com
caught
up with George on January 27th in England where he is undertaking
interviews of potential recruits, returning to Bermuda Thursday 30th
January. The interviews are being conducted where George is staying: |
George, what will you do if you son does not disclose the supplier of the
drugs? |
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn
London Mayfair
3
Berkeley Street
Mayfair
London
W1J 8NE
Tel: (020) 74938282
Fax: (020) 76292827
e-mail
himayfair@holidayinnmayfair.co.uk |
George, what are you going to do about your son's involvement with drugs on
your return to ensure a good example is set? |
|
|
|
|
The initial
contact with George met with a reasonable response, the request by
www.bermudapolice.com for information was
answered: |
George, why is the matter to be the subject of a regimental enquiry only? |
|
|
|
|
If you wish to
speak to me face to face you can do so |
|
George, what will you do to ensure your son does not associate himself with
narcotics in the future? |
|
|
|
|
however, when
asked when would be convenient, George responded 'not today' and asked that
we call tomorrow. However, when seeking a convenient time for us to call,
the question appeared to to difficult, George hung up. |
|
|
|
|
Another call was made to George, to ascertain
when would be convenient to meet with him. On this occasion the call was
taken by a woman understood to be Miss Rogers, of the Human Resources
department Bermuda. Unfortunately, although also engaged in interviewing,
she did not know when George would come free. Despite asking when would be
a good time to call back, we could only obtain a 'couldn’t tell you,
probably late this afternoon'. |
|
|
|
|
We attempted to
be helpful, seeking a suitable time to speak. George then continued the
conversation and it became evident that despite the lapse of 12 years he had
not changed; the same old blunt bully who has trouble thinking on his feet.
We were not spoken to, we were spoken at, George obviously believes his word
is the law and has trouble thinking before he speaks. the response was as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
He wished to
tell the caller two things:
1. firstly and most importantly he did not appreciate being disturbed
2. secondly, if the caller had anything to ask, we should go through a
solicitor
He
then added (a third thing - George having difficulty counting beyond two?): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
"do
not call me back or else I’ll have a complaint lodged against you" |
|
|
|
|
|
George, make
your complaint. Do you really believe that anyone is interested in
your own self-importance? We are waiting to be contacted following your
complaint George; we remind you that we have called back; twice! We
are calling your bluff George, in fact we are doing more; we demonstrating
your childishness, your stupidity. |
|
|
|
|
Is it that you
were just shooting your mouth off; the George no-action Jackson of old whose
best or only defence is to threaten? George, you are supposed to be a
policeman of some experience. Just what complaint are you going to make -
do you have any idea about the law or are you just playing at being a
policeman? |
|
|
|
|
As for a
solicitor, kindly think before you speak George. There is no requirement
for me to use a solicitor. I am entitled to ask you questions. I suspect
this is a case of you saying something to impress your peers or because, to
you, it sounds clever. It is not clever, nor are you. As evidenced by that
comment, you are a fool, the court jester of the Bermuda police circle.
George, if you do not wish to speak, or are unable to do so, then you of
course may appoint a solicitor to handle the issues on your behalf. We are
more than competent and capable of asking questions; we do not need others
to speak on our behalf. It was a silly comment George. |
|
|
|
|
I
would not be subjected to your blinkered, loud attempts at intimidation
whilst I served in the Bermuda police service, do you think that I now have
the least respect for you, believe you know what you are taking about or
will be influenced by you? Grow up George, you are not in Bermuda now - you
cannot rely on your oppressive conduct here. |
|
|
|
|
George, you are
the one who suggested a meeting; you are being telephoned, following you own
comment, to arrange the meeting. It appears you have a big, fast mouth and
that you put your foot squarely in it. You have offered a meeting; on
reflection have you realised that it is not wise, that you are not bright
enough to survive a face to face interview so you choose to duck it? |
|
|
|
|
As for your
entourage; Miss Rogers did her best to fend off a telephone call and
it was sweet of you to step in and come to her aid. I trust you will be
adequately thanked for such gallantry. |
|
|
|
|
Mike Jackman
appears to be an unnecessary expense; he is not involved in the interviews
but is accompanying you for administration purposes. Why? |
